OpenAI Counters Apple's Trade Secret Lawsuit, Citing Competitive Shortcomings
OpenAI has rejected Apple's allegations of trade secret theft, asserting the lawsuit is a retaliatory measure stemming from Apple's struggles in artificial intelligence development and talent retention.

OpenAI has responded forcefully to a lawsuit filed by Apple, characterizing the accusations of trade secret misappropriation as without merit and calling for the federal judge to dismiss the case. The artificial intelligence firm suggested that Apple's legal action might be driven by envy over OpenAI’s market achievements.
In a 28-page reply to the lawsuit, OpenAI's legal representatives stated that Apple should not be permitted to leverage a baseless and pretextual lawsuit to obscure its deficiencies in attracting and retaining employees, alongside its failures in integrating AI into its product offerings. The lawsuit specifically targets two former Apple employees, Chang Liu and Tang Tan, alleging they misused confidential company information to aid OpenAI in developing its nascent hardware division. Liu and Tan were hired by OpenAI earlier this year and last summer, respectively.
OpenAI further elaborated on its position in a blog post, which included excerpts from iMessage conversations between Liu and his former Apple colleagues, as well as email exchanges between the legal teams of both companies. The post criticized Apple, known for its meticulous attention to detail, for what OpenAI described as a lawsuit that regrettably did not live up to the tech giant's own standards.
According to OpenAI's official response, Liu was merely attempting to assist former colleagues who had initially contacted him, seeking information they struggled to locate after his departure from Apple in January. Regarding Apple’s claim that Tan encouraged departing employees to disclose trade secrets during interviews with OpenAI, the AI company asserted this was part of routine recruitment and hardware development activities.
OpenAI's filing also highlighted that Apple failed to pinpoint a specific trade secret allegedly shared with Tan, which, the company argued, weakens the lawsuit's central claim that he violated the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA).
Apple has frequently been perceived as a slow entrant in the competitive AI landscape, one of the few major technology companies that did not swiftly prioritize the technology following the emergence of ChatGPT in late 2022. This approach has been interpreted by some as a strategic misstep and by others as prudent patience given the dynamic and unpredictable nature of the AI market.
Despite this, Apple has not been entirely inactive, announcing a collaboration with OpenAI in June 2024 to integrate ChatGPT into Siri and various on-device services. However, the relationship between the two entities has reportedly soured, partly due to OpenAI's development of its own hardware business, which included the acquisition of IO last year. IO was co-founded by Jony Ive, a former Apple executive and iPhone designer, and also by Tan.
The intense competition for top talent has emerged as a significant factor contributing to the friction between the two technology behemoths, a trend that has broadly fueled animosity across the tech industry in recent years. A substantial number of engineers and other professionals have migrated from established tech companies to newer AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic, often attracted by exceptionally high starting salaries, even by Silicon Valley standards. Apple's lawsuit indicates that OpenAI has hired over 400 former Apple employees.
Sources
Written by
The Company Wire
Inside the companies building what’s next. Reporting on startups, technology, funding and the people shaping them.



